对于即将到来的11月5日的托福考试，不知道各位考生准备的怎么样呢？今天100留学的老师为大家带来了最新整理出来的11月5日托福综合写作小范围机经预测，本预测中包含了口语机经预测话题的解析及示范回答，相信一定会对各位同学的托福备考有所帮助，下面就让我们来看一下11月5日托福综合写作小范围机经预测的具体内容吧：

‍

1.

Reading：

Reading：阅读说在罗纳河（Rhone River）发现了一个半身像（bust），说这个半身像就是凯撒（Caesar），罗马的一个领导者。

1. 那个半身像是现实主义（realism）的形式表现，然后凯撒的时代也是现实主义的时代；
2. 半身像的头发的表现和真实的凯撒一致（跟钱有关）；
3. 因为是在河里发现的，以前人们想销毁它，有新的领导者上任，留着它是不尊重的。

Listening：

反驳阅读的论点
1. 现实主义在凯撒死后还在继续盛行；
2. 只有头发的样式相匹配，其他的特征一点也不符合；
3. 罗纳河中还发现了其他的雕塑，和那个半身像相补充，并且将其扔进河里，就是为了处理这个垃圾。

范文：

The reading and the listening both discuss whether the bust found in Rhone River refers to Caesar. However, what the reading suggests is pretty different from main content in the listening.

First, in the reading, it is said that the bust could not be regarded as Caesar, for realism occurred in his time. In contrast, the professor holds an opposite opinion and then states that although realism did thrive in Caesar's age, it continued after he died, which means this bust might refers to other celebrities rather than Caesar. This directly contradicts what the reading indicates.

Second, the author of the reading considers the hair of the bust the evidence of the subject, Caesar. On the contrary, the speaker refutes such idea by pointing out that even if the style of hair does match Caesar's, other features do not match at all. The face, hands, and even the pattern of clothes are more likely to be the features of another person. Therefore, the bust failed to become the statue of Caesar. This is another part where the listening contrives the reading.

Third, the reading passage asserts that because the new leader was in power, if the bust of Caesar stayed, it was a mark of disrespected to the new leader, so the bust was found in the river. Nevertheless, the lecturer maintains that there were other sculptures also found in that river, and they were right added that bust, which means throwing it into the river and then just aiming to dispose the trash.

2.

Reading:

希腊湖（Greek Lakes）中亚洲鲤鱼的数量过多，破坏了当地环境。可以采取以下三种措施进行预防：
1. 建造一座围墙;
2. 使用电气设备;
3. 采用两步法：首先，使用毒药杀死所以鲤鱼；第二，引进当地物种。3. 威胁到人的安全，当地人害怕狼。

Listening:

从下面三点进行反驳：
1. 湖泊附近的工厂要在那里运载货物和使用船只，这样做成本很大。而且船只在城墙一边的装载货物，在另外一边还要重新装载。
2. 小鱼仍然可以游过这些装置，从而在湖泊里生长和繁殖。
3. 没人可以预测这些毒药会在将来污染这些湖泊。

范文：

The reading and the listening both discuss three measures to stop the damage caused by Asian carp to local environment. However, what the reading says is quite different from the main idea in the listening.

First, in the reading, the author suggests that building a wall is a good way to prevent Asian carp. In contrast, the professor holds a different opinion that this method will cause inconvenience. That is, factories are near the lake, and they use cargos and ships there. It will cost a lot if ships upload on one side of the wall and another ship reload at the other side. This directly contracts what the reading indicates.

Second, the reading asserts that using electrical devices can diminish Asian carp's side impact on local environment. On the contrary, the lecturer refutes such view by pointing out that little Asian carps still can swim through the device, and then they grow up and reproduce in lakes, leading to disagreeable effect. This is another part where the listening contravenes the reading.

Third, the author of reading considers that using poison is a good measure to recover the environment. Nevertheless, the speaker disagrees with this idea and then states that using toxin to kill Asian carp is a drastic and dangerous way. No one can predict that the poison and the related effect won't pollute the lake in the future. Therefore, the professor thinks that the final point in the reading is wrong again.

3.

Reading:

Reading: 有3种方式可以使燃煤变得更环保
1. 使用一些新技术，如高压，可以使燃煤变得更有效；
2. 洗煤(Coal washing)可以移除硫化物和其他化学物质；
3. 重新将碳收集储存，循环二氧化碳，并将其存在海里。

Listening: 从三个方面进行反对：
1. 接下来几年人口会增加13%，而即使有新技术，效率也只能提高10%。能源需求的增加会弥补由效率增加而节省的能源量；
2. 洗煤(Coal washing)会将对空气的污染转移到海洋；
3. 收集碳很贵而且冒险，要是碳泄露出去，对环境和人类都非常危险。

范文：

In the lecture, the professor challenges the claim that the coal could be consumed in a more environmentally-friendly way. He suggests that the approaches recommended are far from being effective.

First of all, although cutting-edge technologies such as high pressure could improve the efficiency in coal combustion, the demographic increase would probably negate the effect of such innovation. In fact, global population would grow by 13% in next four years while the possible boost of coal productivity can only reach 10%, which means the demand of coal would still exceed the supply.

Second, as one of the proposed methods of preserving environment, cleaning coal in water is actually useless, even if chemicals such as sulfide are removed. Admittedly, chemical pollutants, as stated, could be washed away by rinsing coal in clear water. The vast area of ocean, however, would become the victim of such practice. Chemical substances once existed in coal are now moved to sea, contaminating this non-renewable resource.

Finally, retrieving carbon and storing them in the ocean, defined as carbon recycling, is simply not feasible since the process is extremely dangerous and costly. Providing that there is a carbon leakage, the consequence would be catastrophic both in terms of environment and human being.

4.

Reading：修补牙齿是否应该使用汞合金这种材质
阅读持反对观点，给出三条理由，听力一一加以驳斥。
1. 汞损害人的神经、免疫等系统，危害人体健康；
2. 从牙医诊所流出的汞合金废物经下水道排进江河湖泊之后，会污染水质，进而威胁野生动物；
3. 还有其他材料，比如金、陶瓷、树脂等可以取代汞合金，规避其弊端。

Listening：

1. 汞合金里的汞含量很小，不足以造成人身危害，只有少数对汞过敏的人会受到影响；
2. 安装过滤隔离装置就能防止汞流进水路，造成破坏；
3. 在口腔这种湿润环境下，汞合金更耐用，而且单价也比金要便宜很多。

范文：

The reading passage presents three points to support that it is not advisable to employ mercury in dental repairs, while the speaker thinks otherwise.

To begin with, the reading states that mercury exerts malign effects on people's health by undermining human neurological, mental, and immune systems. According to the lecture, however, study has shown that small amount of mercury contained in dental amalgam is unlikely to be harmful to the vast majority of people, apart from those who are allergic to the material.

In addition, the author argues that the mercury escaped from dentists' offices through sewer networks will spoil the rivers and lakes and later pose threat to the wildlife. The professor refutes this argument by pointing out that separators, which are capable of collecting substances, can be installed in the drains to prevent the amalgam waste from entering into the waterways.

Finally, contrary to the belief in the passage that such less harmful materials as gold, porcelain and resin can replace mercury, the lecturer contends that mercury alloy lasts longer than those alternatives, as the mouth is a wet environment, and besides, it is economically more affordable, especially compared with gold, which is more expensive per unit.

5.

Reading：

Harappan（哈拉帕，一个古代群落） 衰落的原因：

1. 游牧部落的侵略，而且Harappan 的画和其他东西都表明Harappan 没有军队；
2. 气候变化导致农业减产，没有足够的剩余食物供养更多的人口；
3. 流行病大范围传播，并且喝的水污染了，传染扩大。3. 电视和媒体很少有这个语言的节目。

Listening：反对：
1. 被侵略的城市只是Harappan 的很小一部分，Harappan 很大，少部分被侵略不会影响整个群落的衰落；
2. 同时期其他两个群落，如埃及和美索不达米亚也遇到了气候变化；但是他们适应了环境。他们能够生产出足够的食物来维持人口；
3. 说Harappan 有足够的水源，而且Harappan 在过滤水方面很先进，因此大范围的污染是不可能的，而且传染病更不能大范围传播。

范文：

The speaker contradicts the content in the reading paragraph, focusing on the three reasons for the demise of the Harappan people.

Firstly, the statement in the reading paragraph says that evidence from their remaining paintings and other relics suggest they had no army and they couldn't survive the intrusion. While based on the speaker's account, the cities invaded only comprise a small part of the whole community, which will exert a minor influence on the whole, if there is any.

Secondly, from the reading content, one reason why Harappan disappear is due to severe and dramatic climatic change, which leads to sharp decline of food supply, then it is not surprising that the community lost their base for a living. Conversely, the speaker argues against this assertion by introducing another two communities- Egypt and Mesopotamia, both of which underwent the climatic change as well, and were capable of adjusting to the environment.

Finally, the third reason the reading paragraph provides is the far-reaching epidemic, as well as contaminated drinking water that poisoned the citizens. However, according to speaker, drinking water is sufficient and the Harappan made use of relatively advanced water-filtering facilities. Therefore, the community was not likely to suffer from infected water, and the epidemic was not able to spread widely.
 

9.

Reading：

应不应该在海里建人工珊瑚礁（artificial reef）

1. 人工珊瑚礁给鱼类更多聚集和繁殖的空间，鱼类数量可以得到增加；
2. 人工珊瑚礁可以改进小渔民的竞争力；
3. 人工珊瑚礁可以用于回收无用的材料。

Listening：

1. 鱼的总数不一定增加，这是因为珊瑚礁吸引鱼，所有鱼都跑到珊瑚礁那里去了，因此鱼的总数就减少了；
2. 不应该让私人搞小珊瑚礁，不然有安全问题：其他渔夫不知道的，下网以后就会出现问题。在浅水域，小船还会整个裂掉（cracks）。
3. 会引起环境问题，被风吹了会散开，然后把很多海洋植物和动物都搞死了。

范文：

The lecture opposes the view mentioned in the reading with strong supporting evidences presented, aiming to further illustrate that it is not a wise idea to build up artificial reef in the sea.

Firstly, from the perspective of habitat, the professor states his doubt, because according to the lecture, although the fish will be attracted by the coral reef and congregate around the habitat, competition for habitat and food sources will be fiercer than before. And this is harmful for the population growth.

Moreover, judging from the potential economic value, the professor holds a different view, the professor holds a different view, as the lecture further illustrates that there will be problems concerning safety. For example, the reef will make the sea even shallower, and if unfortunately some ship crosses over this area, the ship will crack.

Last but not least, on the point of natural resource, the professor never fails to express his concern, because in terms of the listening, there might be some environmental problems. When the dead reef is blown over the sea, it will bring danger to many marine plants as well as animals.

以上就是100留学为大家整合的2016年11月5日托福考试综合写作小范围机经预测，各位同学可以结合自己平时积累的写作素材，在考试前多加练习，一定会对接下来的托福考试有所帮助。